On January 13th, 2021, the president of Uganda, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, through the Ministry of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) ordered for the immediate shutdown of the entire internet and all social media platforms. Every wireless transaction was put to a standstill right from mobile money services to banking operations.
Later after the presidential elections, the internet was switched back on but social media platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter and others were exempted, pushing Ugandans to resort to using Virtual Private Network (VPN).
Well, did you know the repercussions this new solution to internet censorship has brought about?
A human rights organization known as Unwanted Witness has come out to sensitize the country about the dangers of using VPN.
The Nongovernmental organization says that Ugandans are unknowingly surrendering their information to the private network proprietors who own the online services.
Unwanted Witness says that privacy, data safety and trust are being eroded in Uganda as government censorship intensifies.
Ever since the election period, the Ugandan government has threatened to arrest people accessing social media via VPN, although Ugandans have paid a deaf ear.
If we are to refer to the recent comments from Internal Affairs Minister Gen. Jeje Odongo, the blocking of social media is not likely to end soon, which means more Ugandans will continue using VPN.
The state asserts that opposition politicians use social media platforms to incite violence, reason why they were blocked in Uganda.
Chris Kalema, the Lead Technologist at Unwanted Witness, says that use of VPNs in our daily lives creates an addiction but they siphon our data in form of names, addresses to do behavioral analytics for marketing and profiling.
Kalema explained that; “This information is transferred to third party users or the makers of these Apps without the users’ consent.”
He added that; “VPNs are designed with codes that have trackers that the users may never know and unfortunately Ugandans are using them without any clarity.”
The group contends that throughout the election process, Unwanted Witness observed increased use of technology by security agencies for surveillance on street protests and opposition political rallies, with intent to limit dissenting voices.
“This has resulted into arrests and disappearance of an unidentified number of youths and scores of deaths,” Kalema noted.
He added that; “The elections also posed another risk to people’s privacy, as there was lack of public scrutiny in the use of biometric machines to verify voters, and unfamiliar results transmission systems generated mistrust between citizens and the Electoral Commission, thereby jeopardizing the credibility of the process.”
As a move to curb the spread of COVID -19, the Electoral Commission instructed political candidates to use digital platforms to scour the country for votes, but the group says it witnessed an unprecedented illegal use of people’s data by politicians.
“Political parties were not transparent about their data processing activities, including publicly identifying the mechanisms they used to engage with voters, like social media, websites, and direct messaging, and how they collected people’s data, what data they collected, and the sources of it and how they used it,” Kalema noted.
“The Electoral Commission failed to have in place effective safeguards (Binding code of conduct/Regulations) that reflected changes in digital campaigning,” Dorothy Mukasa, the Executive Director of Unwanted Witness Uganda, said.
“By doing this, they would have fulfilled their mandate established under Article 60 and Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 (as amended) to organise, conduct and supervise regular, free and fair elections and referenda, among other functions,” she added.
She noted that one of the qualities of a trusted data collector is the ability to be transparent and accountable to the data subjects as enshrined in Section 3 (a) and (f) of the Data Protection and Privacy Act 2019.
The human rights group also alleged that statutory agencies that use people’s data, like the Electoral Commission or National Identification and Registration Agency (NIRA) which gather, use, disclose and manage a person’s data, do not have a Privacy Policy.
“This lack of transparency led to voters missing out on the voting exercise because the voters’ register was unclean with voters’ names repeated, name-face mismatches and deletion of some voters’ names from the register,” the group claims.
It also urges the government of Uganda to expedite the enactment of Data Protection and Privacy regulations for effective enforcement of the Data Protection and Privacy Act 2019, and to fully restore internet to avoid data manipulation risks that come with the use of VPN.
By John Kenny Adenya
Leave a Reply