Connect with us

NATIONAL

I Warned Katureebe On The Consequences Of LDUs, They Are Now Killing Ugandans, Beating Up Judges And Insulting Leaders – Lawyer Mabirizi….

Published

on

LDU officer beating up a local trader (Courtesy photo)

Revolutionary lawyer Hassan Male Mabirizi has revealed that he warned judicial officers on the consequences of incorporating Local Defense Unity (LDU) into the security system but they decided to rule otherwise without thinking that they will one day also become victims.

Mulengeranews recently revealed how Soroti Resident judge Wilson Musalu Musene and his counterpart David Wangutsi, a judge of the High Court Commercial Division were badly beaten by LDUs in Mbale town for violating the presidential curfew directive.

On Tuesday evening, social media was awash with a video of LDU personal and army officers insulting Joseph Luzige, the chairperson of Mityana District. Luzige who is a member of the ruling NRM party was accused of trying to stop security officers from beating a boda boda cyclist who was carrying a pregnant woman.

LDUs have of late been accused of killing innocent Ugandans under the guise of implementing presidential directives in the fight against COVID19.

In an exclusive interview with this website, Mabirizi disclosed that that he smelled a rotten rat and collapse of the rule of law when security operatives stormed parliament and beat up members of parliament who were against the lifting of the age limit that is why he ran to court to guide the nation.

He explained that unfortunately, the courts of law presided over by the eminent members of the society led by retired Chief Justice Bart Magunda Katureebe ruled that it was not illegal for security men to raid parliament and beat legislators.

“On 15th January 2019, during the hearing of the age limit case, I warned Katureebe and his six other justices of the Supreme Court that the consequences of upholding collapse of rule of law through failure to nullify a law passed through UPDF violence would be indiscriminative because judges would also fall victims one day,” Mabirizi explained.

He added that he reminded Katureebe the scenario where former Chief Justice Ben Kiwanuka was killed from his office and in Ghana and in Nigeria where judges were arrested from court.

“I told them that the effects of their ruling will be like a hailstorm ravaging a village, it does not discriminate among pagans, Christians or Muslims and here we are, judges and district chairpersons are being battered,” Mabirizi noted.

He explained that when president Museveni officially incorporated LDUs into the national security organizations, he ran to the High Court again and challenged this decision because it was illegal.

“LDUs were going to turn against Ugandans and legally there was no law one could use to challenge their acts,” Mabirizi said.

The maverick lawyer explained that to his surprise, his case was dismissed after High Court judge Musa Ssekana reasoned that LDUs are members of the reserve forces without being gazetted.

Mabirizi insisted that if Ugandans keep on folding their hands without legally challenging the behavior of security agencies, Uganda is going to turn into a lawless country.

When contacted, Joseph Luzige said that he was degraded and humiliated before his people and he expects that disciplinary action is taken against the culprits.

The former Democratic Party strongman wondered why security personnel are behaving in a hostile way yet they are answerable to civilians who are paying for the facilities they are using and their salaries.

He noted that before he was insulted, he was trying to save a boda boda man who was carrying a pregnant woman from being thumped by these security personnel.

 

By Sengooba Alirabaki

Comments

NATIONAL

I Swear Upon God It Wasn’t Me: Saleh Distances Himself From Ndeeba Church Demolition Before Kazimba…

Published

on

Gen. Salim Saleh, the coordinator of Operation Wealth Creation (OWC) has distanced himself from the demolition of St Peters Church Ndeeba in Kampala.

There were media reports that had started linking Saleh as the invisible hand funding Dodoviko Mwanje, the man who facilitated the demolition of the church.

While addressing the House of Bishops led by Archbishop Stephen Kazimba at Kawanda Research Institute, Saleh said that he was saddened by allegations that he was behind the extinction of the church.

“I’m (always) here in Kapeeka, I haven’t got time to respond, I’m hearing Saleh you are grabbing land, am I a mad person to grab a church? So for that matter, I want to swear before you the Bishops and Archbishop that in the name of God I’m not involved in that church demolition issues,” Saleh assured the House of Bishops from the Anglican faith on Wednesday.

 

By Grapevine Reporters

Comments

Continue Reading

NATIONAL

I Want To Look At Bobi’s Academic Papers, Someone Born In  1982 Cannot Join Primary One At Two Years Of Age! – Mabirizi Questions EC Over Kyagulanyi Nomination…

Published

on

Contentious city lawyer, Male Mabirizi has petitioned the Electoral Commission to avail him with the academic documents of Kyadondo East Member of Parliament (MP) and National Unity Platform (NUP) leader, Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu alias Bobi Wine.

On Tuesday, The EC announced that Kyagulanyi was among 8 other candidates picked nomination forms to stand for presidency, taking the total number of applicants to 19, after 10 others collected theirs on Monday.

In a petition dated 10th/August/2020, Mabirizi wrote to the Electoral Commission secretary requesting for certified copies of Kyagulanyi’s nomination academic papers for the Kyadondo East by-election, in which the latter eventually emerged victorious.

The introductory part of the petition read; “I address you in my capacity as a civically active Uganda well aware of your constitutional duty as elaborated under Article 61(1)(d) of the Constitution to organize, conduct and supervise elections and referenda in Uganda and you indeed held a bye-election in Kyadondo East bye-election where Robert Kyagulanyi participated as a candidate and declared winner and now a sitting Member of Parliament.”

The lawyer noted that section 4(3)( C) of the Parliamentary Elections Act ,2005 provides that a person is only qualified to be an MP if that person has completed a minimum formal education of at least Advanced level standard or its equivalent of the Ugandan Education system, a fact he says he wants to prove.

Mabirizi persisted that the EC must have therefore have been availed with his academic documents to prove Kyagulanyi completed the Uganda Advanced Certificate of Education or its equivalent before nominating him. Mabirizi now demands to have a look at the NUP leader’s papers.

“The required documents are required to satisfy my doubts that the said Kyagulanyi Robert Ssentamu possesses the said qualifications given that as per his details via the parliamentary website, he was born in 1982 and sat A- level in 1998. Implying that if the birth year is true, he sat A-level at 16 years, O-level at 13 years PLE at nine years and joined primary one at two years,” Mabirizi insinuated.

The lawyer insisted that his doubts can only be satisfied by looking at the academic documents tendered to the Electoral Commission in 2017 at nomination prior to the Kyadondo East by-election.

Robert Kyagulanyi is currently legally battling allegations of illegally obtaining, taking over and changing the National Unity, Reconciliation and Development Party (NURP) into the National Unity Platform and later assuming it’s presidency.

The provocative lawyer has in the past been notably known to contentiously dare the head of state, the state itself and various state officials to legal battles in the courts of law. And for a traditional Muganda man who has petitioned his cultural leader before, Mabirizi’s latest move is significantly so typical of him. For many however, mostly Kyagulanyi’s fanatics have deemed his action as an attempt to seek relevance to shelter his ambitious political career, on a hint that he could vie for the upcoming 2021 general election.

 

By Baron Kironde

Comments

Continue Reading

NATIONAL

You Cannot Pay Katureebe For Doing Nothing – Mabirizi Challenges Former CJ’s Retirement Package, Stands In Matembe’s Way Back To Parliament….

Published

on

L-R: Matembe, lawyer Mabirizi and former CJ Bart Katureebe

Controversial city lawyer Male Mabirizi Kiwanuka has asked the East African court of Justice to stop the election of the five representatives of the elderly and the elections in the new 46 constituencies until his main suit is determined.

Mabirizi petitioned the regional court challenging the bills passed by parliament and accented to by the president during the COVID19 lockdown.

He insisted that all the bills which include the parliamentary elections Amendment bill which turned into an Act, the passing of the Uganda Administration of the Judiciary Bill which turned into Act, the passing of shs1.8trn supplementary budget on the 25th of June 2020, the Uganda Minister of Justice and Constitutional affairs making and Uganda parliament approval of the Republic of Uganda’s political parties and Organization Conducts of meetings and Elections Regulations 2020 and President Yoweri Museveni’s appointing of Dorothy Kisaka as the new Executive Director of Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) all contravene the constitution of Uganda and the East African Treaty.

Former ethics and integrity Minister Miria Matembe has declared interest to contest for one of the five seats to represent the elderly in the eleventh parliament.

She revealed that God told her to put all other assignments aside and go back to parliament to represent her fellow old people something that lawyer Mabirizi says is illegal.

In his petition to the regional court, Mabirizi claims that the decision of the parliament of Uganda and president Yoweri Museveni through assent, to commit colourable legislation by amending article 78(1) of the constitution, altering the composition of parliament as stated there under by creating the five seats for elderly persons through the parliamentary elections amendment bill 2020, are lawful and infringements on the fundamental and operational principles of the East African Community  which include good governance including adherence to the principles of democracy , the rule of law, accountability, transparency and the maintenance of universally accepted standards of human rights.

Mabirizi insisted that the bill was passed without quorum, public participation or debate and the bill for amendment of the constitution.

The controversial lawyer also challenges the passing of the Judiciary Administration bill 2020 because there was no quorum in the house.

“Section 29 grants retirement benefits to surviving spouses and dependent children of the deceased judicial officer for 15 years which defeats the principles of good governance, equity before the law and common sense,” Mabirizi stated.

He wondered in his petition why the retiring judicial officers are given salaries and other benefits equivalent to those of the serving judicial officers when the retired one is no longer working.

He also challenged section 20 which allows judicial officers to work in other institutions contrary to Article 128(1-2) of the Constitution since this creates a window for the president to compromise judges through such appointments.

Mabirizi insists that section 5(d) and 18-12 give the judiciary council a function to maintain ethics and integrity within the judiciary and set up an inspectorate of courts within the judiciary, contrary to Article 147(1)(b) of the constitution which prescribes one of the functions of the Judicial Service Commission as to receive and process people’s recommendations and complaints concerning the judiciary and the administration of justice and generally to act as a link between the people and judiciary.

He noted that the establishment of the judicial service in the new law contravenes Article 148 of the Constitution which provides that the Judicial Service Commission may appoint persons to hold or act in any judicial office other than the offices specified in article 147(3) of the constitution and confirm appointments in and exercise disciplinary control over persons holding or acting in such offices and remove such persons from offices.

He further revealed that the new law creates the secretary to the judiciary to be appointed by the president under article 174 of the constitution contrary to Constitutional court decision which held that being an independent arm of government , the judiciary cannot have its secretary appointed by the president.

He further explained that it’s very clear in the constitution that parliament shall not pass any law to alter the decision or judgment of any court as between the parties to the decision or judgment.

In the same suit, Mabirizi also challenged the creation of the 46 new constituencies saying they were passed without quorum, without debate and without suspension of parliamentary Rules of procedures requiring debate which is contrary to article 63(2) of the constitution which requires the demarcation to be made by the electoral commission, article 63(3).

He added that the Constitution requires the electoral commission to review the division of Uganda into constituencies within twelve months after the publication of results of the census of the population of Uganda and may as a result redemarcate the constituencies.

 

By Sengooba Alirabaki

Comments

Continue Reading

like us

TRENDING

error: Content is protected !!