Connect with us
  • NATIONAL

    Kabaka Mutebi Family, Buganda Kingdom Royals Fight Deepens As Court Seals Off Ownership Of Kingdom Multibillion Properties…

    Published

    on

    Kabaka of Buganda Ronald Muwenda Mutebi

    The five Justices of the Constitutional Court led by Justice Richard Buteera the Deputy Chief Justice, Justice Catherine Bamugemereire, Justice Muzamir Kibeedi, Justice Irene Mulyagonja and Justice Oscar Kihika have sealed off the legal battled between the Kabaka of Buganda Ronald Muwenda Mutebi and the Kingdom princes and Princesses on the ownership of the Kingdom multibillion properties.

    Prince Kalemera Kimera son to Prince Harold Kagoro Kimera, who is a son to fallen Buganda Kingdom’s Sir Daudi Chwa sued Kabaka Mutebi and the Attorney General Kiryowa Kiwanuka accusing them of hiding behind the Traditional Rulers (Restitution of Assets and Properties) Act to grab the properties they inherited which are currently registered in the names of the Kabaka of Buganda.

    In his affidavit, Kalemera told Court that his father was appointed as the administrator of his grandfather’s estate and the government of Uganda has so far denied him the opportunity to benefit from his grandfather’s assets.

    He told Court that the Traditional Rulers (Restitution of Assets and Properties) Act is inconsistent and contravenes Article 26 of the Constitution hence deprives him of his properties.

    He further cited that Section 2 (4), (5) , (6) , (71 and (8) of the Traditional Rulers (Restitution of Assets and Properties) Act is inconsistent with Article 26 (2) and 21 of the Constitution hence discriminates him by birth and social standing from claiming his beneficial interest in the estate of his father and grandfather.

    He explained that the act of the Attorney General allowing the registration of private properties owned by his grandfather into the names of Kabaka of Buganda was unconstitutional to the extent that it contravenes Article 2, 21, 246 (3) (a) of the Constitution.

    He insisted that the Attorney General legitimises an act of fraud by expressly providing for the omission of payment of any tax, duty or fee and by alteration or cancellation of any relevant certificate of title and issue of a fresh certificate of title or otherwise is to that extent unconstitutional.

    He asked Court to declare that and order that Sections 2 and 3 of the Traditional Rulers (Restitution of Assets and Properties) Act are inconsistent with Articles 2, 21, 26, 246 (3) (a) and (b) of the Constriction, and are to that extent void.

    Kalemera further wanted the Constitutional Court to direct the High Court to investigate the proprietorship of properties registered in Kabaka’s name while hiding under the Traditional Rulers (Restitution of Assets and Properties) Act to ensure proper restitution to the beneficiaries of the estates of the registered proprietors.

    He pleaded with the Court to direct Kabaka and President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s government to compensate him with USD 60,000,000,000 (United States Dollars Sixty Billion) for the properties deprived of him and other beneficiaries.

    However, the Attorney General through Franklin Uwizira, a State Attorney challenged the petition stating that it does not disclose a cause of action against the Attorney General.

    He asked court to declare it misconceived, prolix and an abuse of processes since it does not raise any issues or questions for interpretation of the Constitution.

    Uwizira’s evidence was supported by the affidavit from Bashir Kizito Juma the Attorney appointed by Kabaka Mutebi who denied all the allegations placed on him.

    He challenged the petitioner to provide evidence showing that his grandfather privately owned Kabaka’s Lake and land comprised in Busiro Block 183 Plot l at Bumera.

    He explained to court that the petitioner’s claim for recovery of the properties is misplaced and asserted that the said claims need first to be established before a competent court and are therefore not matters for constitutional interpretation.

    He placed the burden on Kalemera to prove that the land forming part of the estate of his grandfather was returned to Kabaka as he claimed and once he gathers enough evidence, he should petition an ordinary court not the Constitutional Court as he did.

    In her lead judgement, Justice Mulyagonja noted that the petitioner unequivocally admits that the relevant part of Article 26 of the Constitution which he seeks court to interpret was already interpreted by the some court and the decision binds so there is nothing to interpret.

    On the issue of the alleged violation of the petitioner’s rights due to the cited provisions of the Constitution and other laws, Mulyagonja advised him to return to the High Court to complete the suits that he filed which are still pending determination.

    “It was therefore an abuse of the process of this court and the High Court and a waste of the valuable time and limited resources of this court. For that reason, the petitioner shall pay the costs of the petition to the respondents, in any eventer,” Mulyagonja stated while other justices on the panel agreed with him.

    Prince Kalemera returned back from the United Kingdom where he was serving in the King’s army to fight for his grandfather’s estate.

    Since 2015, he has been fighting with Kabaka Mutebi accusing him of using his power and influence to grab properties belonging to other Buganda Royals.

    However, Kabaka Mutebi has been defeating him using Kiryowa Kiwanuka as his personal lawyer before he was appointed the Attorney General.

    Kabaka Mutebi’s Constitutional Court judgment is a big blow to other members of the Royal family who are planning to petition court claiming that Kabaka Mutebi has been using his office to grab their inheritance.

    Grandchildren of the fallen Buganda King Suuna are also threatening to sue Kabaka claiming that he has grabbed their land at Budo and Nabbingo.

    However, Denis Bugaya of Buganda Land Board, the Kingdom agency assigned by Kabaka Mutebi to manage the Kingdom land rubbished the allegation made by Robert Ssewava one of the grandchildren of fallen King Suuna.

    Kabaka Mutebi is still battling with city controversial lawyer Male Mabirizi who also petitioned the Constitutional Court seeking a declaration that Kabaka Mutebi is not the owner of Buganda Kingdom official mailo land but only a trustee.

     

    By Sengooba Alirabaki

    Comments

    NATIONAL

    Bobi Wine Declines To Meet Troubled MP Luumu Concerning His Amendment Involving Electing LoP…

    Published

    on

    NUP leader Bobi Wine and MP Richard Lumu (inset)

    Controversial Mityana South legislator Richard Kizito Lumu is stranded waiting for feedback from the leadership of the National Unity Platform (NUP) over his prayer to meet them to get their view concerning his proposal to amend the Parliament’s Administration Bill 2024.

    Lumu was told by the Speaker Annet Anita Among to proceed with his amendments and he was given leave to draft and table the bill where he is seeking to amend Parliament’s Administration Act  which among others seeks to change the method of choosing the Leader of Opposition in Parliament.

    Lumu wants the LOP to be voted by the entire opposition MPs and not the leader of the leading opposition party in the country.

    Lumu also wants the Deputy Speaker of parliament to be elected from members of opposition and the number of opposition parliamentary commissioners to be increased from one to two among others.

    Lumu confirmed that he notified all opposition political parties which have legislators in parliament in writing seeking for their audience to collect their views on his proposals before he presents it on the floor of parliament for the first reading.

    Last week, Lumu met the leadership of UPC.

    He added that this week, he is going to meet other opposition political parties even though the leadership of NUP declined to reply him.

    He adds that he doesn’t know whether to meet their leadership at their party headquarters at Makerere Kavule in Kawempe Division or at the home of their party president Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu (Bobi Wine).

    However, Alex Mufumbiro the NUP deputy spokesperson noted that they don’t have time for Lumu given that they have a lot of issues to deal with especially liberating Ugandans from president Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s alleged bad leadership.

    He explained that if Lumu really wants their input in his controversial bill, he would have first met them before presenting it to parliament.

    Recently, theGrapevine reported that Bobi Wine claimed that Lumu is being used by President Museveni and speaker Among to weaken the opposition and deny Ugandans right to elect their president.

    He predicted that after the passing the Lumu bill on electing the LOP, his next assignment will be to produce a bill giving parliament powers to elect the president.

     

    By Hadijjah Namagembe

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    CRIME

    Top City Tycoons, UETCL Bosses In Trouble Over Shs28.8bn Illegal Compensation Deal…

    Published

    on

    UETCL CEO Joshua Karamagi (C) and his deputy Eng. Richard Matsiko (R) whose staff are under investigation from IGG Betty Kamya (bottom L) following Minister Mayanja's report (top L)

    The Inspector General of Government (IGG) Beti Namisango Kamya has kicked off investigation into allegation that top city tycoons connived with Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL) to benefit from Shs28.8bn illegal compensation from President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s government.

    The development resulted from a requested letter from Dr Sam Mayanja the State Minister for Lands in the Ministry of Lands Housing and Urban Development claiming that the land where government compensated the tycoons is public land hence they fraudulently obtained the land titles they used to secure the deal.

    Mayanja revealed to the IGG that he has done preliminary investigation into the allegations and establish that the tycoons secured the land titles registered on: LRV 4143 Folio 2 Plot 14, LRV 4143 Folio 3 Plot 16, KCCA 3741, Folio 19 Plot 12A, LRV 4144 Folio 7 Plot 28-40,  LRV 4139 Folio 13, Plot 8, LRV 4130 Folio 14, Plot 41, Volume KCCA 232 Folio 21, Plot 1-4. 5-7, and 8-11 and LRV 4149 Folio 15 Plots 18-26 and 10-12 fraudulently after learning that the government was going to pass the Namanve-Luzira 132 KV transmission through that land.

    Mayanja further claim that the accused tycoons include: Flavia Muntuyera, Asuman Irunga, Delmas Apartments Limited, Prestigious Apartments Limited, Aisha Mulungi, Irene Kwera and to his surprise, Muntuyera and Irunga had been listed twice which means they had benefited twice.

    Mayanja also revealed that he has established that the said tycoons didn’t pay stamp duty when the land titles were made in their respective names.

    In the letter to the IGG, Mayanja said that he has instructed the Commissioner Land Registration to put a caveat on the said land titles in question until the investigations are complete.

    He pleaded with her to also take legal action against all the culprits for causing financial loss to the government.

    However, theGrapevine established that the multibillion transaction resulted from a court suit where the tycoons sued the Attorney General Kiryowa Kiwanuka, UETCL which was represented by K&K Advocates, a law firm where Kiwanuka is a founding partner and the Commissioner Land Registration and all parties entered a settlement to resolve the matter out of court.

    It was agreed that all the plaintiffs agreed to be compensated with Shs28.852bn being full and final settlement on all the claims they had on the land and highly placed sources in the Ministry of Lands confirmed to theGrapevine that the said amount of money was paid to the beneficiaries.

    However, in September 2023, Attorney General Kiwanuka wrote a legal opinion advising that the government should not compensate any land title in a wetland and his advice was directly going to the people who claim that they were affected during the construction of the electricity transmission line along Namanve-Luzira.

    “Section 44 of the Land Act guides us on how we should deal with this land and provides for the control of the environmentally sensitive areas. Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that titles issued in wetlands, including those in lakes after the Land Act Cap 227, are contrary to the law and illegal,” the Attorney General stated.

    theGrapevine has established that the Commission of Inquiry into land matters, Justice Catherine Bamugemereire who was the chairperson of the commission recommended that people who obtained private land titles in Namanve and Luzira wetlands including those in the lake should not be compensated by the government.

     

    By Sengooba Alirabaki

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    NATIONAL

    Pressure On MP Ssemujju Mounts As M7’s NRM And Bobi Wine’s NUP Plot To Kick Him Out Of Kira Municipality…

    Published

    on

    NUP boss Bobi Wine (L) at lawyer George Musisi's home. Inset is MP Ssemujju Nganda

    Highly placed sources in National Unity Platform (NUP) have revealed to theGrapevine that the reason why their party president went to the thanksgiving ceremony organized by his personal lawyer and also human rights activist George Musisi at his Bulindo home was to make sure that the entire Kira Municipality feels his presence in the area.

    Credible sources said that NUP inner circle has already taken a decision to front lawyer Musisi to contest on their card against Ibrahim Ssemujju Nganda who has been in parliament since 2011.

    Ssemujju recently told theGrapevine that he will retire from parliamentary politics once President Museveni is defeated thus pouring cold water on rumours that he was going to retire and give other politicians an opportunity to represent the area in parliament.

    Early this year, Musisi told theGrapevine that he was going to contest against Betty Nambooze in Mukono Municipality.

    However, NUP insiders have told theGrapevine that Bobi Wine and his handlers established that it is not the right time to lose Nambooze one of the senior legislators who decided to stomach public attacks from his longtime political comrades like Mathias Mpuuga Nsamba shielding the actions of Bobi Wine in the Shs500 million service award saga.

    Sources added that Ssemujju is in NUP’s black book of MPs who undermine Bobi Wine and he recently faced off with Alex Waiswa Mufumbiro who declared him a hypocrite.

    Sources said that Bobi Wine was briefed that Ssemujju can be defeated if a strong candidate is fronted against him because voters have established that he is among the opposition legislators who have been sealing multibillion deals with members of the DEEP STATE.

    “You have seen how Ssemujju shields Mpuuga concerning the Shs500m scandal. He has been demeaning our party president that he was misled by our Leader of Opposition in Parliament Joel Ssenyonyi. He said that he cannot sign any document that is against Mpuuga because of their friendship. But when it comes to Museveni, he roasts him like nothing; that kind of person cannot be a leader,” a source who is a top decision maker in NUP said.

    He added that voters see Ssemujju as a very conservative leader because he doesn’t even allow them to enter his home.

    He placed a tent near his home and whoever wants to see him waits for him from that tent.

    However, Ssemujju said that he was in a good life even before joining politics, his wife Faridah Ssemujju was driving a good car and his children were studying in good schools and even if he leaves parliament, his life will not change.

    Sources said that at first Bobi Wine and his people were planning to front real estate dealer Jimmy Lukwago who was was defeated by Ssemujju in 2021 elections because Bobi Wine’s brother Eddy Yawe had already declared his interest to contest for Wakiso district chairperson yet their secong option, Kira Municipality mayor Julius Mutebi, was still interested in contesting for the same position he is occupying.

    Sources in Lukwago’s camp are aware of the development at Makerere Kavule where the headquarters of NUP are situated and it is the reason why their man has decided to go back to the drawing board.

    But others insiders told us that Lukwago is hiding from voters who have already started asking him for money and he needs money to secure the NUP ticket because he thinks that this time it is going to be more expensive compared to 2021.

    Bobi Wine was briefed that Musisi is very strong and popular in Church of Uganda because he sits on the land committee of Kira Church of Uganda a position he has used to improve the lives of youths and women in Kira.

    Sources added that Musisi is easy to be marketed among the people of Kira municipality because most of them are elites like himself and are tired of the tricks Ssemujju and friends in the opposition in parliament play which costs the taxpayers money.

    Sources said that Bobi Wine was briefed that FDC Najjanankumbi leadership led by Patrick Amuriat and Nathan Nandala Mafabi have been clandestinely mobilizing people from their home areas of Teso and Bugisu who stay in Kira to register and vote from there so that they can use their numbers in the box to defeat Ssemujju.

    President Museveni’s National Resident Movement (NRM) is also on the ground mobilizing political support to force Ssemujju out of Kira and they plan to front a one Isaac Ssenkubuge who is the Bweyogerere Division chairperson.

    theGrapevine has established that strategic meetings for Ssenkubuge are conducted every weekend at Zebra spot hotel near Kira Division police chaired by Mamerito Mugerwa the former Kira Municipality mayor.

    Ssenkubuge confirmed his intentions to contest against Ssemujju explaining that for a long time he has been hoodwinking people that he is in the opposition while silently benefiting from Museveni’s government.

    However other sources said that Mamerito Mugerwa is the one fronting Ssenkubuge and financing his political ambitions to revenge on Ssemujju whom he accused of leading his downfall in 2021 when he contested to become Kira Municipality mayor.

    Mamerito says Ssemujju told voters that he is a thief.

    “Ssemujju told people that Mamerito is a thief who steals water from National Water and Sewerage Corporation. He also told them that he steals the checks that government donates to women groups to fight poverty. He further accused Ssenkubuge of being Mamerito’s barking dog and mouthpiece because by then Mamerito was sick and could not ably speak,” a source said.

    Sources claim that in 2021,  Ssenkubuge was defeated by NUP’s Faruk Muniga, Kkonde who was bankrolled by Ssemujju through FDC came next and Ssenkubuge was in 3rd position.

    Surprisingly, he was declared the winner and Muniga took the matter to Court. Up to now, the matter has not yet been decided.

    Sources said that Ssenkubuge is very sure with such political maneuvers, he is very likely of defeat Ssemujju and Musisi come 2026 parliamentary elections.

    He added that Ssenkubuge got a photograph when President Museveni was in a meeting with Ssemujju’s father Mzee Nganda who is his close friend and a supporter of NRM.

    Ssemujju admitted that his father is a friend to Museveni and one time when Museveni visited the defunct WBS TV to appear on Face the Press talk show moderated by senior political journalist Peter Kibazo, Museveni was very bitter with Ssemujju for attacking his government and family and threatened to report him to his father Nganda.

    However theGrapevine has established that Ssemujju is still strong on ground especially among the elites and Musisi and Ssenkubuge have to work so hard to defeat him.

     

    By Timothy Nyanzi

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    like us

    TRENDING

    theGrapevine is a subsidiary of Newco Publications Limited, a Ugandan multimedia group.
    We keep you posted on the latest from Uganda and the World. COPYRIGHT © 2022
    P.O Box 5511, Kampala - Uganda Tel: +256-752 227640 Email: info@thegrapevine.co.ug
    theGrapevine is licenced by Uganda Communications Commission (UCC)