By Stella Mugoya: Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development Matia Kasaija along with the Secretary to Treasury, Keith Muhakanizi are set to know their fate over misappropriation of over Shs720M meant to purchase drugs for National Medical Stores (NMS) today.
The decision will follow a debate on the floor of Parliament following an investigation carried out by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) that recommended the firing of the Ministry’s top officials. An investigation conducted by PAC, led by Angeline Osegge (Soroti Woman MP), into the acquisition and utilisation of the USD200M approximately Shs727,832,761,440 loan (at current exchange rate), uncovered evidence that revealed that although the funds were received by the Ministry, the intended beneficiary NMS didn’t receive the funds.
Despite the fact that the report had been completed in August 2017, it didn’t feature on the Parliament order paper until the report came up for presentation in January 2018.
Top among the recommendations was the call to have Kasaija censured. “For misleading the House to believe that the most critical funding objective was medical supplies, lying to Parliament in writing that NMS had never provided the needed supply contracts to enable disbursment of funds and further duping Parliament by re-packaging the same loan thus obtaining money by false pretense, the Minister of Finance Matia Kasaija must be censured,” the report read in part.
However, after the report was presented, Kasaija, who had earlier been described as a “hostile witness” after he declined to appear before PAC during the investigations, asked the Deputy Speaker, Jacob Oulanyah to allow him present his evidence before a decision on the matter is taken. Kasaija begged, “I want to be given an opportunity in this matter to explain. I would like Parliament to create good time for me to bring all the evidence, facts and where I have faulted I will apologize, I’m sure I have done what I ought to have done. Therefore, I would request that you give me an opportunity to give my response.”
Oulanyah obliged to Kasaija’s pleas and allowed him to present his evidence, plenary sitting was adjourned up to 30th January 2018, when the matter is expected to come up for discussion again.
On the other hand, it wasn’t only Kasaija that put up a spirited defence over the accusations labeled against him, but Muhakanizi too filed his defence.
For Muhakanizi, his sins come after it was discovered that he lied to the Committee that the loan was acquired for purposes of stabilising the exchange rate with the approval of Bank of Uganda, a claim the Central Bank vehemently denied as false.
Muhakanizi who was a former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the PTA Bank is accused of acting out of selfish interest, by insisting on acquiring the loan despite objections from the Central Bank Governor and the Accountant General, who protested against the loan arguing that the loan was not favourable because of its high interest rate.
Yet with all the accusations and calls to have him relieved of his duties, Muhakanizi scoffed at his tormentors during a media briefing at the Ministry headquarters on 16th January 2018, saying he isn’t going anywhere.
“I see a number of you make a statement that I am about to be sacked because of the PTA Bank loan. I can assure you I have a contract I will serve it up to the end. Take it from me because I accounted publicly in the papers for all the resources,” Muhakanizi bragged. He explained that the funds in contention were borrowed legally and the whole process passed through the same Parliament that has now turned around to investigate him, arguing he released as per appropriation of Parliament, to all the entities. The Secretary to the Treasury added, “And therefore, I am as clean as I can be. So, all those who have speculated that I am about to go, I am here. It is just wastage of your time, just concentrate on what you are doing. I am here as Secretary of Treasury for some time.” Ahead of the debate on the matter, Kasaija called for backup from his NRM counterparts during a caucus meeting at Office of the Prime Minister, but his pleas fell on deaf ears as many told him to pay for his own sins, with most of them arguing that the time to shield Government officials implicated in corruption had elapsed.
Glance Into PTA Loan Fracas
The funds were a loan acquired from the Eastern and Southern African Trade and Development Bank (PTA). The Finance Ministry tabled a request to borrow the funds on 3rd March 2016 with the Ministry arguing that the money was meant to finance development expenditure imports and replace part of the high interest domestic borrowing on 3rd March 2016.
Although Parliament rejected the loan proposal on 7th January 2016, with the Parliament Committee on National Economy, that was charged with processing the loan stating that Uganda is a member of the International Monetary Fund and is required to borrow to boost government reserves to finance shortfalls in the Balance of Payments if there is an urgent B.O.P deficit needed.
In the circumstance however, Parliament found no urgency with the loan request since at the time (December 2015), Uganda’s reserves were worth 3.9 months of imports and this did not demonstrate any urgency to Uganda as its import cover is above 3 months of the import cover benchmark of the IMF, Parliament said while rejecting the loan proposal.
Parliament’s decision to reject the loan followed a warning by the Central Bank Governor who wrote to the Minister of Finance on 2nd February 2016, objecting to the loan noting that the primary motivation for contracting the PTA loan was to stabilize the exchange rate in the face of temporary shocks, yet Balance of Payment were not purely temporary. In his recommendations, the Governor said that given the fact that Bank of Uganda had more than sufficient foreign exchange reserves to support these interventions; with the reserves in the Bank coffers at the time amounting to USD2.8Million and therefore did not require additional resources mobilised from the PTA Bank, and more so a loan.
The Ministry of Finance however bounced back again and presented the same loan proposal for the second time on 6th April 2016, but this time around, the title of the proposal had been changed and highlighted that the loan was intended to provide medical supplies by NMS. The Ministry of Ministry of Works and Transport and Rural Electrification Agency were the other intended beneficiaries and the loan was approved by Parliament on the 26th April 2016 with signing of the loan agreement on 26th June 2016.
It wasn’t long before National Medical Stores requested for USD68Billion after suffering numerous budget cuts and severe depreciation of the shilling against the dollar. And on 30th November 2015, Muhakanizi admitted the funding constraints and told NMS that the loan was being processed by Parliament, although by The situation continued to get out of hand and by 10th May 2016,
NMS hadn’t received a penny and reminded Muhakanizi of the USD68Million supplementary budget. This time around, Muhakanizi said the money would be provided in the FY 2016/2017 and went on to demand NMS to submit procurement contracts for items with foreign currency requirements for FY 2016/2017, a request NMS abided with.
In a letter dated 27th April 2017 to the Minister of Health, copied to NMS, the Minister of Finance stated that a sum of Shs7Billion had been provided as a supplementary in 2016/2017 and that Shs20Billion had been provided to NMS as arrears in 2017/2018. This time around, the Secretary to Treasury cautioned NMS should get medicines on credit worth Shs41Billion.
According to the Committee investigations, Muhakanizi’s letter stating that Shs41Billion will be availed in the next FY2016/2017 was a confirmation that the money had not been given to NMS, despite the loan having been received by Government.
Now, the Committee has called to have the USD200Million be recovered, re-consolidated to NMS to be used for purchase of medical supplies.
Leave a Reply