Connect with us
  • NEWS

    OPINION: Uganda’s Political Transition Is Secure: Things Of “Who Comes Next In The Political Queue” Do Not Put Money In Anyone’s Pocket Or Bring Food On Any One’s Table…

    Published

    on

    President Museveni after meeting DP boss Nobert Mao (L). Inset is the writer Faruk Kirunda

    I admire and respect the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Mr. Nobert Mao, whom I first knew as a firebrand Guild President at Makerere University and later Member of Parliament for Gulu Municipality, LC 5 Chairman and DP President General.

    Joining Cabinet as a Minister despite being a DP leader speaks of his willingness to mend fences for the sake of peaceful co-existence and harnessing President Yoweri Museveni’s policy of working with all regardless of political and other differences.

    Minister Mao’s DP is a key player in Inter-Party Organisation for Dialogue (IPOD), a body uniting political parties with representation in Parliament, boycotted by some other parties powered by radical isolationism. His advocacy for a transition can be understood from his “outsider” background but he is now best placed to work from within to cause the change he pushes.

    However, I belong in the category of those who believe that there is no controversy around transition, and duly conclude that there is no need to lose sleep over it. Our Constitution provides for transitional procedures which align well with the democratic dispensation we enjoy.

    Most times when someone talks about transition-or succession-the focus is on the Presidency. Reason being that Uganda has had President Museveni in power since 1986. To me, every five years there is a transition, except that the same person is reelected President.

    Each successive term of the President is unique from the preceding one since the mandate is different. Besides, every five years, we have a new cabinet, a new Parliament, new Local Councils and so on. This is a constructive transition!

    About transition at Presidential level, if an incumbent loses elections, the winning candidate takes over, simple! All one needs is a 50% plus 1 (one) to win. If there has been no transition (at all), the challenge is on opponents of President Museveni for failing to defeat him. It’s not his challenge. Every leader seeks to maintain advantage over competitors. That’s the nature of politics. Ugandans reserve the power to cause a power shift and the legal regime provides for that.

    There is no need to panic or be anxious for change; it cannot be forced. It’s okay to talk about it but sometimes such discussions divert us from things that should really interest us.

    We should work more for “economic transition” than discussing political transition which is guaranteed under the Constitution. Ugandans are grappling with great need to take the next step economically while the Government is all out to devise methods to enable the people to join the money economy.

    Economic transformation is the main challenge of our times which we should address with all our might, mind and will. Things of “who comes next in the political queue” do not put money in anyone’s pocket or bring food on any one’s table. Instead, they mislead Uganda’s to think that a new Government would put free money in their pockets or put food on their table as if by magic.

    Transition and succession talk gives confidence and relevance to the President’s opponents but nobody knows who may win the next general elections. There could be surprises, including people that currently have less say in politics.

    Those obsessed with the two ideas may feel a sense of entitlement to benefit from the transition directly, looking at positions and roles, but that is not in the interest of the Ugandan that needs support to grow his or her agricultural enterprise or small shop. Let’s prioritise economic transformation and service delivery. The politics will sort itself within the democratic allowance in place.

    We can discuss the process and how to improve it but transition as a subject matter is, in my view, redundant and over pressed. The transition fanatics have a chance to mobilise for the change they want, that’s opponents of the President have always come up to challenge him, because they are aware that the transitional infrastructure is in place, expect that they fall short on defeating the incumbent.

    President Museveni has created a platform for people to grow their potential unlike in the past when potential successors were eliminated. If anybody is meant to be the one to take over, he or she will not fail to find a foothold. If there is anyone to thank for the “transitional space” in place, it is President Museveni, as opposed to being a stumbling block to the same.

    Or maybe they want him to hand power to another person who is not elected by Ugandans, just for the formality of seeing power change hands. The President has never said he cannot hand over to someone else if defeated or if he chooses not to contest elections again, but who is that person for whom a red carpet must be laid when it costs blood and sweat to put us back on course?

    Our Constitution does not leave room for speculation and at the appointed time, there will be a transition on all fronts as and when Ugandans are satisfied with the conditions and contenders in place.

    For now, can “alternative leaders” justify themselves by promoting Government’s transformation programmes and fighting corruption, crime; promoting unity and harmonious co-existence, etc? The question that should attract our attention is: “Transition to do what?” Transition for the sake of it did not help Uganda at its hour of greatest need in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

    We had leaders lasting only months, what did that benefit us? On the contrary, we were greatly stabilized until a stable Government took over, steering us through turbulent seas until now when we have regular free and fair elections.

    Let’s consolidate that without losing sight of the most pressing objectives and needs of the people-they need jobs, they need capital, they need industries to add value to their produce and earn higher profits, they need better health care, roads, schools and so on.

    I wish to allay the fears of all Ugandans that the question of transition is already answered within our Constitutional framework as well as in our democratic practice. Let’s play our part within the democratic calendar in place!

     

    Faruk Kirunda is the Deputy Presidential Press Secretary

    Contact: kirundaf2@gmail.com

    0776980486/0702980486

    Comments

    NATIONAL

    Bobi Wine Declines To Meet Troubled MP Luumu Concerning His Amendment Involving Electing LoP…

    Published

    on

    NUP leader Bobi Wine and MP Richard Lumu (inset)

    Controversial Mityana South legislator Richard Kizito Lumu is stranded waiting for feedback from the leadership of the National Unity Platform (NUP) over his prayer to meet them to get their view concerning his proposal to amend the Parliament’s Administration Bill 2024.

    Lumu was told by the Speaker Annet Anita Among to proceed with his amendments and he was given leave to draft and table the bill where he is seeking to amend Parliament’s Administration Act  which among others seeks to change the method of choosing the Leader of Opposition in Parliament.

    Lumu wants the LOP to be voted by the entire opposition MPs and not the leader of the leading opposition party in the country.

    Lumu also wants the Deputy Speaker of parliament to be elected from members of opposition and the number of opposition parliamentary commissioners to be increased from one to two among others.

    Lumu confirmed that he notified all opposition political parties which have legislators in parliament in writing seeking for their audience to collect their views on his proposals before he presents it on the floor of parliament for the first reading.

    Last week, Lumu met the leadership of UPC.

    He added that this week, he is going to meet other opposition political parties even though the leadership of NUP declined to reply him.

    He adds that he doesn’t know whether to meet their leadership at their party headquarters at Makerere Kavule in Kawempe Division or at the home of their party president Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu (Bobi Wine).

    However, Alex Mufumbiro the NUP deputy spokesperson noted that they don’t have time for Lumu given that they have a lot of issues to deal with especially liberating Ugandans from president Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s alleged bad leadership.

    He explained that if Lumu really wants their input in his controversial bill, he would have first met them before presenting it to parliament.

    Recently, theGrapevine reported that Bobi Wine claimed that Lumu is being used by President Museveni and speaker Among to weaken the opposition and deny Ugandans right to elect their president.

    He predicted that after the passing the Lumu bill on electing the LOP, his next assignment will be to produce a bill giving parliament powers to elect the president.

     

    By Hadijjah Namagembe

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    MY MONEY

    Kampala City Traders Boss Kabanda In Deep Trouble For Mismanaging Money Members Contributed To Fight EFRIS…

    Published

    on

    FUTA chairperson John Kabanda (L) and Godfrey Katongole (R)

    Kampala city traders associations members under their umbrella body the Federation of Uganda Traders Association (FUTA) have tasked their controversial chairperson John Kabanda to give them accountability for the funds they contributed to run federation activities.

    Isaac Kauma, a member of Kampala Traders Association, exclusively revealed to theGrapevine that Kabanda turned furious and started spreading malicious propaganda against a section of traders who are demanding for accountability of their money which they have been contributing since last year.

    Kauma narrated that when President Museveni confirmed that he was going meet them again on 18th July, 2024 at Kololo Airstrip ground to further discuss their grievances over the controversial Electronic Fiscal Receipting and Invoicing Solution (EFRIS), Kabanda and other FUTA leaders approached traders and asked them to contribute money which they were going to use to transport traders from all corners of the country to fill the entire venue to show the president that they have the numbers and the capacity.

    He added that Kabanda confirmed to them that they need numbers to out compete members of the Kampala City Traders Association (KACITA) who wanted to show the president that they are the ones controlling traders after accusing KACITA leadership of betraying them and by being in bed with Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) which was imposing EFRIS on them.

    Kauma asserted that more than 1000 traders around Kampala city contributed between Shs10,000-Shs20,000 but the meeting didn’t take place because the venue was under renovation and the president promised to meet them on another date.

    He said that State House made the said announcement after Kabanda and other traders’ leaders met Museveni at State House Entebbe and they were told that Kabanda and his deputy chairperson Godfrey Katongole asked the president for a private meeting with him which the president accepted.

    Kauma added that they later learnt that Kabanda and Katongole asked the President to give them Shs3bn to mobilize traders to accept EFRIS a proposal the president declined to accept.

    The President told them that he doesn’t the money they were asking for but promised to put Shs300m in their SACCO.

    “From that day, Kabanda’s behavior is questionable, he always doesn’t want to be asked questions on why the president is not meeting us and turns furious when asked to give us accountability for the money we contributed for the function which didn’t take place,” Kauma said.

    He revealed that the accountability issue has weakened the federation thus causing a sharp fight between Kabanda and Katongole.

    Other traders allege that Kabanda has fired Katongole from being his vice chairperson and removed him from their WhatsApp group and replaced him with Moses Lwegaba the chairperson of Katukazane Shoe Dealers Association.

    Sources claim that Katongole supporters are now threatening to take action against Kabanda for firing the man who has done everything in the struggle to fight for traders and replaced him with a newcomer.

    Insiders are now alleging that the two leaders are fighting over a bribe they received during the EFRIS strike when traders closed their shops.

    There is another allegation that Katongole was given money to go to the Eastern part of the country and mobilize traders to join the strike but he refused to go and decided to hide in Kampala.

    When he was put under pressure to provide evidence that he traveled upcountry and had none, he was shown the exit.

    When contacted, Kabanda confirmed the infighting, explaining that it is aimed at weakening his FUTA leadership and the trust that the traders have placed in them.

    He revealed that even though he is receiving threatening messages, his resolve is still strong and he is ready to fight for all traders.

    He denied allegations of mismanaging traders’ money.

     

    By Timothy Nyanzi

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    CRIME

    Top City Tycoons, UETCL Bosses In Trouble Over Shs28.8bn Illegal Compensation Deal…

    Published

    on

    UETCL CEO Joshua Karamagi (C) and his deputy Eng. Richard Matsiko (R) whose staff are under investigation from IGG Betty Kamya (bottom L) following Minister Mayanja's report (top L)

    The Inspector General of Government (IGG) Beti Namisango Kamya has kicked off investigation into allegation that top city tycoons connived with Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL) to benefit from Shs28.8bn illegal compensation from President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s government.

    The development resulted from a requested letter from Dr Sam Mayanja the State Minister for Lands in the Ministry of Lands Housing and Urban Development claiming that the land where government compensated the tycoons is public land hence they fraudulently obtained the land titles they used to secure the deal.

    Mayanja revealed to the IGG that he has done preliminary investigation into the allegations and establish that the tycoons secured the land titles registered on: LRV 4143 Folio 2 Plot 14, LRV 4143 Folio 3 Plot 16, KCCA 3741, Folio 19 Plot 12A, LRV 4144 Folio 7 Plot 28-40,  LRV 4139 Folio 13, Plot 8, LRV 4130 Folio 14, Plot 41, Volume KCCA 232 Folio 21, Plot 1-4. 5-7, and 8-11 and LRV 4149 Folio 15 Plots 18-26 and 10-12 fraudulently after learning that the government was going to pass the Namanve-Luzira 132 KV transmission through that land.

    Mayanja further claim that the accused tycoons include: Flavia Muntuyera, Asuman Irunga, Delmas Apartments Limited, Prestigious Apartments Limited, Aisha Mulungi, Irene Kwera and to his surprise, Muntuyera and Irunga had been listed twice which means they had benefited twice.

    Mayanja also revealed that he has established that the said tycoons didn’t pay stamp duty when the land titles were made in their respective names.

    In the letter to the IGG, Mayanja said that he has instructed the Commissioner Land Registration to put a caveat on the said land titles in question until the investigations are complete.

    He pleaded with her to also take legal action against all the culprits for causing financial loss to the government.

    However, theGrapevine established that the multibillion transaction resulted from a court suit where the tycoons sued the Attorney General Kiryowa Kiwanuka, UETCL which was represented by K&K Advocates, a law firm where Kiwanuka is a founding partner and the Commissioner Land Registration and all parties entered a settlement to resolve the matter out of court.

    It was agreed that all the plaintiffs agreed to be compensated with Shs28.852bn being full and final settlement on all the claims they had on the land and highly placed sources in the Ministry of Lands confirmed to theGrapevine that the said amount of money was paid to the beneficiaries.

    However, in September 2023, Attorney General Kiwanuka wrote a legal opinion advising that the government should not compensate any land title in a wetland and his advice was directly going to the people who claim that they were affected during the construction of the electricity transmission line along Namanve-Luzira.

    “Section 44 of the Land Act guides us on how we should deal with this land and provides for the control of the environmentally sensitive areas. Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that titles issued in wetlands, including those in lakes after the Land Act Cap 227, are contrary to the law and illegal,” the Attorney General stated.

    theGrapevine has established that the Commission of Inquiry into land matters, Justice Catherine Bamugemereire who was the chairperson of the commission recommended that people who obtained private land titles in Namanve and Luzira wetlands including those in the lake should not be compensated by the government.

     

    By Sengooba Alirabaki

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    like us

    TRENDING

    theGrapevine is a subsidiary of Newco Publications Limited, a Ugandan multimedia group.
    We keep you posted on the latest from Uganda and the World. COPYRIGHT © 2022
    P.O Box 5511, Kampala - Uganda Tel: +256-752 227640 Email: info@thegrapevine.co.ug
    theGrapevine is licenced by Uganda Communications Commission (UCC)