Connect with us
  • NATIONAL

    I Am The Only Woman To Have Ever Ruled Uganda – Amin’s Wife Madina Narrates How She Ruled Uganda For 10 Days…

    Published

    on

    The late Idi Amin's wife Madina Amin (Courtesy photo)

    Madina Amin, wife to former historical president, Idi Amin Dada cleared the air on her late husband’s brutality, mass killings and stealing of public funds, among others.

    Madina recalls that her first encounter with Amin was at Silver springs as a performer. Amin later through Malyamungu, his right hand man, schedule for a meeting with Madina at an army camp.

    Madina was initially invited on grounds of a job offer, but on meeting Amin, he was quick to make it clear that he wanted to take her as his official wife.

    “And how could a young, ambitious woman in Madina turn down a man as ambitious and charming like Idi Amin Dada?” she said.

    On what exactly attracted her to Amin, who was not yet president at the time, Madina says she was impressed with his socially diverse character.

    The relationship was however unstable at the beginning. The two lovers could hardly meet as that was coincidentally the same time Amin was too busy bidding to capture power.

    In 1971 around January, when the field Marshall finally captured power, they started having enough time together.

    Before stopping her from performing as an entertainer, Amin invited Madina with her performing group on almost every occasion, she travelled with him  there wherever he went.

    He later got her a house in Kololo. And that’s where she had their first son Abdul Nasser Mwanga, named after a prominent Buganda King on the 28th of May in 1972.

    Madina says that Amin’s mother predicted his son’s presidency. She also told him to retain and preserve the Buganda kingdom legacy, because they had been good to them as Nubians.

    As required in the Muslim faith, Madina officially introduced Amin to her family.

    “Amin historically did that in a quite remarkable fashion. As Head of state, he drove alongside two of his men, plus four others who he had sent there earlier, making an entourage of only six people who accompanied him to officially take his wife to his home, from her parents.

    Only Idi Amin has done that as president,” she said.

    At one time when he was president, Amin controversially announced to the public his break up with three of his four (4) wives.

    Even though Amin was allegedly brutal and a rough administrator, ironically, he was a calm, loving family man.

    Madina says that he loved his kids and when he came back home after a long day’s work, he used to sit down on the carpet and play with them even after a hectic long day in office.

    At home, Amin was not as violent as perceived by the public and even though he was a strict disciplinarian when necessary and a very religious man, “Idi Amin was a staunch believer and staunch believer of the Muslim faith,” she says.

    The fallen general’s widow justifiably describes his late husband as a free man who only found it necessary to devise strictness as his core administrative plan, given the defiant nature of Ugandans.

    As observed by Madina, Amin moved with a gun; in his car, besides the bed, everywhere!

    Madina says that he also equipped his wife with a pistol upon her completion of a 3 months military training.

    One time as the head of state and OAU chairman, Amin survived a grenade attack on his way home. His body guard got injured in the process. Amin personally drove him to Mulago hospital for treatment. On reaching home, stained with blood, he told her to give him clean clothes, and he headed straight back to state house to work.

    As a first lady, Madina with a utter sadness on her face recollects the bitter memories of the Israel rescue attack on the Ugandan at Entebbe international airport on the 4th of July, 1976.

    She refers to it as an honestly very hard time to live with in the mind.

    “It was a horrible experience, when they came to take their people, they left so many of our people dead,” Madina recalls.

    With ample knowledge about her own husband, Madina Amin claims Idi Amin never had any money or secret bank accounts outside Uganda.

    “Even when he fled the country, he took very little money and his briefcase, not bags of money most people claim. And that’s also relatively why we, his family are only living a normal life, not as luxurious as is the trend with other first families,” Madina narrates.

    Madina further stresses that if there’s any time Amin appeared with sacks of cash, it was from outside to Uganda, not from Uganda.

    “Like when his friend Gaddhafi offered him sacks of money from Libya, I told him to let us retain at least a sack in the house as family but he boldly said no? He told me it’s the country’s money, not ours,” narrated a rather proud Madina.

    He would later the following morning pack all the sacks of money and send them to the national commercial bank.

    In a televised interview, Madina exclaimed, “It’s hard governing a whole county. Presidents hardly ever sleep.

    This I know because I officially presided over Uganda for a whole 240 hours. I am the only woman to have ever ruled Uganda.”

    Madina says that when her husband left for a ten days trip abroad on confidential duties, he installed her as acting President. Madina says that Amin informed his cabinet and diplomats that she was in charge until his return.

    She narrates that she governed the country at the comfort of her home in Kololo. She later handed back power to her husband she he returned on the 11th day of her governance.

    The former first lady, admits that it’s so stressing to live powerlessly, having been in, and out of power before.

    “Now I bypass my house in Kololo that my husband bought for me, and it’s an ambassador who resides in it because the government took it over,” Madina revealed.

     

    By Baron Kironde

    Comments

    NATIONAL

    OPINION: Why Media Council Can’t Punish The Observer Over Un Registered Journalists…

    Published

    on

    The writer Emmanuel Kirunda (L) and Media Council boss Paul Ekochu (R)

    Scriptures say in Proverbs 28:1 in the Bible that, “the wicked flees when there is no one pursuing them,” this won’t be the case with the Uganda Media Council team that has already mooted a plan to hound the Observer newspaper journalists under disguise of caring to find answers to their alleged breach of journalistic ethics in reference to its regulatory duty, as it cannot go unchallenged.

    In his letter to the Observer Newspaper Editor dated May 8, 2024 under which he summons them to appear before the Council’s disciplinary committee on Monday, 20th May 2024 under section 9 of Press and Journalist Act cap 105, over their May 8, 2024 news article of vol.19 issue 017, titled; ‘MPS Bribed to Save Government Agencies’ that is said to have derogated the sanctity and integrity of parliament, the Council’s chairperson Mr. Paul Ekochu also put the Newspaper administration on notice for failing to register the particulars of its Editor contrary to section 5 of the same Act, saying it is a criminal offense.

    While the Council is charged with the duty of registering journalists and or enforcing penalties in the wake of any un compliance case, it cannot legally exercise the same in its current form, following the violation of requirements under the same legal instrument from onset by the ICT Ministry that performs the supervisory role over the Council and other bodies therein.

    As part of its mandate, the ICT Ministry should be doing a lot in ensuring the better welfare standards of journalists by prevailing over the errant employers who time and again occasion exploitation, but sadly focuses a lot on accusing the practitioners of falling short of ethical standards whose viability spines around the welfare unanswered question, a corner stone to independent journalism.

    Suffice to note is that, although the draconian Act was enacted in bad faith with an intention of annihilating the Uganda Journalists Association (UJA) that had already been around in the space since 1963 managing the journalistic landscape when it was put in place in 1995, this never succeeded as it was rejected by journalists given its anomalies, and it only now remains on books but can’t practically, legally, journalistically and logically be enforced.

    And time has come for the officials in the ministry to accept the sectoral reality.

    Media Council Wrong to Register Journalists.

    As of now the Uganda Media Council cannot sanction the Observer Editor over failure to have registered their particulars or any other journalist, and if this happened, it is illegal according to the High Court’s ruling that was given in January 14, 2021 petition filed by Centre for Public Interest Law (CEPIL) and journalists under the Editors Guild against the Attorney General for Media Council.

    Filing of this petition was prompted by December 20th 2020, then the Deputy Inspector General of Police Maj. Gen. Paul Lokech’s public statement that the Police would block journalists without the Media Council Press cards from covering the 2021 general elections, in reference to the flawed Media Council guidelines for the 2021 general elections.

    Court declared that the registration of journalists by the Media Council of Uganda without an operational National Institute of Journalists of Uganda (NIJU) to enroll journalists in accordance with the Press and Journalist Act is illegal, irrational and procedurally irregular.

    Like Media Council, NIJU, as a creator of the bad law (Press and Journalist Act of 1995), has been at its death point from onset.

    The Councils’ purported guidelines had earlier been strongly protested by the UJA and other journalist organizations, noting that their intention was to curtail the enjoyment of press freedom ahead of the elections.

    The trial judge Esther Nambayo stressed that without the functioning of the NIJU, the Media Council would be acting outside its mandate to register and issue practicing certificates to journalists in Uganda.

    Court also issued an order of permanent injunction restraining the implementation of the illegal and irrational directives of the Media Council.

    Now one wonders how the Observer newspaper will be subjected to penalties by the same Council in moribundity of the would-be journalists’ registration authority!

    Would one therefore, be wrong if they describe as contempt of Court the Council’s decision with regard to the Observer journalists’ fate?

    Would it be wrong for journalists to believe that the Council’s intervention during this time is an attempt to gag critical journalism that helps with pointing to the ills in the society that should instead be addressed by the relevant authorities?

     

    “The Pen is Mightier Than the Gun”.

    This article was written By Emmanuel Kirunda, Journalist and Secretary General, Uganda Journalists Association (UJA).

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    NATIONAL

    OPINION: Bobi Wine’s NUP At Crossroads As Internal Strife & Looming Split Paves Way For Gen. Museveni To Reclaim Buganda…

    Published

    on

    NUP boss Bobi Wine. Inset is President Museveni. On the left is the writer George Mubiru

    Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu’s personal pursuit of excellence may have inadvertently fueled National Unity Platform (NUP) vanity, creating internal tension.

    The “fearfully high standard” alludes to the challenging expectations one imposes on oneself, potentially resulting in moments of self-loathing when those standards aren’t met. It explores the complex relationship between personal aspirations, the emotional toll they can take and NUP’s aspirations as an institution.

    The young party has no chance of resurrection. Tireless efforts of displacing Hon. Mpuuga has completely buried it with least chances of remaining the chief opposition party ( something Bobi Wine feels comfortable to settle down for) come 2026.

    The storm has erupted through out Buganda and angered the staunch Buganda traditionalists and elite politicians whose mirror is Mpuuga. Bobi wine has  created a small group within NUP that believe in kleptocracy, an egocentric virtue which can not mirror out political, social and economic inclusiveness of all Ugandans.

    Bobi Wine and his small group in NUP that seems to feel satisfied with polluting the masses and hoodwink them in order to exploit, impoverish, repress and lie to make money. This is exhibited in his previous calls on the public to riot and reckless utterances of politics of identity to gain sympathy. He has on several occasions attempted to slash social and economic programs extended to the wanainch from western countries and the global economy. They worship Money and opposition power supremacy.

    When more than three thirds of the current NUP Members of Parliament continue to fume over Bobi wine’s poor administration of the party, it has opened the eyes of majority ugandans that the cardinal intention of NUP is not removing Gen. Museveni from power, but to make money.

    There is continuous accusations and counter accusations with in the party at a prime time NRM is reorganizing itself through structures to massively win the forthcoming polls. For example, Hon Abed Bwanika has on several occasions castigated NUP’s secretary general for calendistinely working for NRM and called upon him to resign. He has also accused NUP top leadership for placing homosexuality on its high agenda, something which is morally unacceptable to Uganda’s customs and culture.

    The internal strife has further been worsened by another persistent battle for the true ownership of the party between Bobi Wine and the Kibalama group. This has recently failed the approval of pro Bobi Wine’s new NUP constitution by the electoral commission.

    Various NUP MPs, have on several occasions come out to condemn their party of extortion and continuous money demands. They have expressed regret of landing into the wrong hands of the NUP leader. Others have fallen out with their party on refusal to implement dirty missions which could lead the country and wanainch into turmoil as revealed by hanji katerega when he recently appeared for an interview.

    What is the implication of the  Mpuuga-Bobi Wine-Kibalama fight?

    1. The young party has split into two groups and this division has left Bobi Wine and his group with out the capacity to bridge it. It should be remembered that the same happened to Busoga, the only sub region Bobi Wine won outside Buganda and currently there and two parallel groups; one led by Moses Bigirwa and another by Andrew Kaluya.
    2. NUP has lost its only remaining strong hold of Buganda. Hon Mpuuga is seen as the leading politician in greater Masaka and therefore perceive the allegations against him as witch hunt by Bobi Wine.
    3. A looming political party or pressure group by the elite politicians and majority NUP members of parliament is on the cards. This will be the last straw in the back of NUP. Some people especially the youth, well knowing that NUP cannot cause the change they desire, will definitely follow the new anticipated wave.
    4. President Museveni and the NRM will gain back it’s support from Buganda because of consistence and good will to the country. People would rather revert to NRM for stability. I prophesize victory for Gen. Museveni and the NRM in Buganda come 2026.

    Gen. Museveni is like a cliff. He can’t betray the mission he accepted from the people of Uganda as a revolutionist and freedom fighter. He stands firm and tames the fury of the water around him and strikes with a win.

    He once said; “All those in NUP are my children. You will see. I’m in there, everywhere and work with my children. Kyagulanyi’s group, I will finish it. You just wait. I work from underground as you’re up there shouting oye! Oye! Oye!”

     

    The writer, George Mubiru, is a researcher, political analyst & Ass. RCC JINJA City.

    Tel. 0754877595

    Email: georgemubiru93@gmail.com

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    MY MONEY

    Leaders Of Traders Panicking After M7 Directs Investigation Over Allegations Of An Invisible Foreign Hand Fueling Their Strikes To Sabotage Economy…

    Published

    on

    L-R: Some of the leaders of traders: Godfrey Katongole, David Kabanda and Thadeus Musoke

    Kampala Metropolitan Senior Minister Hajjat Minsa Kabanda has exclusively confirmed to theGrapevine that president Yoweri Kaguta Museveni has directed the country’s intelligence organs and Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) to investigate the alleged invisible hand behind traders’ leadership.

    She explained that preliminary investigations have established that some leaders of traders who are advocating for endless strikes are biased in their decisions because there is an invisible hand pushing them with an agenda of sabotaging the country’s economy and creating an ungovernable situation.

    “We know whatever they are planning. Our people are on ground, so they should stand warned,” Kabanda said.

    She revealed that President Museveni was shocked to establish that in Kampala city alone, traders have more than 30 associations and each one of them has command.

    This has created suspicion and the need for an investigation to establish their true motives.

    The development comes at a time when traders are threatening to go into a two months strike without opening their shops in the city center if president Museveni doesn’t address their demands including the banning of the Electronic Receipting and Invoicing System (EFRIS).

    On 7th May 2024, Museveni directed Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) to sit down with leaders of traders and sort out their differences.

    The President guided that once these leaders and URA agree, they should make a joint report which they should read to him and other traders on 20th of June 2024 at Kololo independence grounds.

    However, before that meeting, Minister Kabanda has disclosed that Museveni is set to meet leaders of traders in the State House to have some issues sorted out noting that government is doing everything in its power to make sure that what happened on 7th May 2024 never happens again.

    She explained that it was bad for traders to shout at the President and embarrass senior government officials to the extent of accusing some of corruption insisting that traders’ behavior sent a warning signal to government that there must be an invisible hand influencing and facilitating them.

    theGrapevine has established that the leadership of Kampala City Traders Association(KACITA) led by Thadeus Musoke Nagenda, Federation of Uganda Traders Association(FUTA), Katukazane Shoe Dealers, Kampala Arcaders Advocacy Forum, United Arcarders Traders Enterprenuers Association,  Uganda Needy and Squatters Association have resolved to join hands and strategise on how to come up with a common voice before the President.

    Highly placed sources in intelligence have revealed to theGrapevine that all eyes are on David Kabanda who is being investigated for working for some opposition bigwigs who promised him support in the coming elections.

    Sources said that Kabanda wants to become the city councilor on Lord Mayor Ssalongo Erias Lukwago’s council.

    However, veteran journalist and the Senior presidential advisor on media Joseph Tamale Mirundi advised Museveni not to take lightly statements made in the United Kingdom’s House of Lords that King Charles’s leadership should influence regime change in Uganda.

    He explained that the western powers are going to use all the available means to sabotage Museveni’s leadership insisting that there is invisible hand in traders’ frequent strikes.

    But a section of KACITA leadership told theGrapevine that there are people in President Museveni’s government who are facilitating the creation of endless traders associations with the aim of benefiting from them and fighting the unity among traders.

     

    By Sengooba Alirabaki

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    like us

    TRENDING

    theGrapevine is a subsidiary of Newco Publications Limited, a Ugandan multimedia group.
    We keep you posted on the latest from Uganda and the World. COPYRIGHT © 2022
    P.O Box 5511, Kampala - Uganda Tel: +256-752 227640 Email: info@thegrapevine.co.ug
    theGrapevine is licenced by Uganda Communications Commission (UCC)